Palmer v. March
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The plaintiff and defendants were jointly interested in certain farming lands and personal property. Differences having arisen between them, they entered into a written agreement for arbitration, under which an award was duly made. This action was brought by plaintiff in the district court for Hennepin county to recover damages for defendants’ failure to perform the award.
Read the full summary
The plaintiff and defendants were jointly interested in certain farming lands and personal property. Differences having arisen between them, they entered into a written agreement for arbitration, under which an award was duly made. This action was brought by plaintiff in the district court for Hennepin county to recover damages for defendants’ failure to perform the award. The action was tried before Lochren, J., without a jury, and judgment directed and entered for-plaintiff, from which defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
It appears, among other things, from the record of the findings of the trial court, that the plaintiff and the defendants were, for several years prior to January, 1882, jointly interested in the purchase, ownership, and management of certain farming lands in the county of Marshall, in this state, and of certain personal property kept and used thereon in the business of farming, chiefly managed by plaintiff; and that the title to the lands, and certain contracts for lands, were held, for the most part, in the names of the defendants. Included in the joint estate was a certain “tree-claim,” so…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Jones v. DunbarNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Persons v. PersonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900