Legal Opinion
City of Altus v. Tinsley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 31, 1939No. 28929PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
The city of Altus, Okla., appeals from a judgment against it for damages caused by obnoxious odors arising from the sewage disposal operations of that city.
The parties are referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The charged error in overruling defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s petition was not presented to the trial court by its motion for new trial, and is deemed waived and cannot be now considered. Belcher v. Spohn, 170 Okla. 139, 39 P.2d 87; Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co. v. Fuss, Adm’r, 86 Okla. 168, 207 P. 308.
We are unable to agree with defendant’s interpretation of an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oklahoma City v. EylarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Aultman & Taylor MacHinery Co. v. FussSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Belcher v. SpohnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
3Cited by8 opinions
- Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Farris v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Harlan v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Powell v. ChastainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. RubleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.