Legal Opinion
Jeffrey Koeppel v. District Board of Trustees of Valencia College, Florida
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 13, 2018No. 17-12562PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ED CARNES:
Accused robbers, rapists, and murderers have statutory and constitutional rights. So does a college student who is accused of stalking and sexually harassing another student. The question in this case is whether Valencia College violated Jeffrey Koeppel's statutory or constitutional rights when it suspended him for his conduct toward another student at the college. The *1225 district court did not think so, and neither do we.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A. Facts
Jeffrey Koeppel met Jane Roe (pseudonym) during the summer of 2014 when they were assigned to the same biology…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- John Doe v. Purdue UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- John Doe v. University of the SciencesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- David Schwake v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Doe v. University of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Speech First, Inc. v. Alexander CartwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.