Legal Opinion

Shoresman v. Burgess

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided May 7, 1976No. 76-2-035PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WISE, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ petition for injunctive relief restraining defendant from enforcing Sections 3 and 4 of the Illinois Corrupt Practices Act, Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 102, §§ 3, 4 (1975) and Section 10-9 of the Illinois School Code, Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 122, § 10-9 (1975). Plaintiffs further seek declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202 against the operation of these statutes as being violative of their rights under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments and 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Jurisdiction is…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BertrandAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  2. Hunter v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Miller v. County of LakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Dwyer v. Conflict of Interest CommissionDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1986
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API