Legal Opinion

Chavoustie v. Stone Street Baptist Church of Chaumont

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law and facts and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: This case presents a dispute concerning the location of the boundary line between the parties’ properties. The trial court, despite having three opportunities to do so, declined to delineate such boundary line. Upon review of the record before us, we find that it contains sufficient facts for us to make the findings necessary to delineate the boundary line (see generally, Northern Westchester Professional Park Assocs. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499; Matter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northern Westchester Professional Park Associates v. Town of BedfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Belotti v. . BickhardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. City of Tonawanda v. Ellicott Creek Homeowners Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Sherman v. . KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Fasano v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walsh v. St. Mary's ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Miller v. PowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Mahar v. LarkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Taitt v. SnellingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API