Legal Opinion

United States v. an Undetermined Number Of

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 23, 1994No. Civ. A. 91-2412-JWLPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

In this case, claimant Clinical Reference Laboratory (CRL) prevailed before the Tenth Circuit on its contention that the specimen containers used by it to test for the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type-1 (HIV-1) were not class III devices requiring premarket approval under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). This matter is presently before the Court on CRL’s motion under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses (Doc. # 73). Because this Court believes that the government’s position was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Hoffman v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. Ruby May HADDEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. Frank R. Harris v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. An Undetermined Number of Unlabeled Cases, Etc., Clinical Reference Laboratory, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lake Pilots Ass'n v. United States Coast GuardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  2. Massie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API