Rials v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.
Earnest insistence is made that the state’s witnesses were so thoroughly impeached as to render a conviction on their testimony unwarranted, and to justify this court in setting aside the verdict. The rules governing questions of this character are too well settled to require citation of authority. Where the -evidence is in conflict, the questions involved are for the jury, -and this court will not on appeal disturb that finding.
There were two houses burned about the same time. One, the Skipper house, was burned first, and was in the direction of the Faulk house, charged in the indictment. It…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Montgomery v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Ham v. State ex rel. BuckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Hamlin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Pearson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
- Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. CoursonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Golden v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
- State v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Cornelius v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
- Golden v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958