Legal Opinion

Nichols

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 7, 1984No. 82-10-230; CA A26788PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Father appeals from an order denying his motion to modify a California decree of dissolution. He moved to change custody of the parties’ eleven-year-old daughter from mother to him, to terminate his duty to pay support and order mother to pay .support and to award mother specific visitation. The dispositive issue is whether the court erred in refusing to take the testimony of the child. We reverse and remand.

At the close of father’s case in chief, he asked the trial judge to interview the parties’ daughter. The judge declined to do so at that time, stating, “If I deem that it is advisable, I…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chandler v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Kreutzer v. KreutzerOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State Ex Rel. Fulton v. FultonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Schafer v. SchaferOregon Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Jethrow v. JethrowMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API