Legal Opinion

Hull v. Feinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 9, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without costs.

By notice of appeal dated July 3, 1985, appellants seek to appeal to this court from an order entered May 20, 1985. The present motion to dismiss is based on the contention that the notice of appeal was not timely served and filed.

It appears from an affidavit of service that the order sought to be appealed, together with notice of entry, was served on appellants’ attorney by mail on May 22, 1985. Although the attorney for appellants alleges that the order with notice of entry was not received by him until July 1, 1985, service by mail was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. A. & B. Service Station, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Morse v. MorseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lovisa Construction Co. v. Facilities Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Levy v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Greater New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Interboro Management Co. v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Baron v. Earl I. Wadhams, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API