Legal Opinion
In re the Accounting of Furry
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided November 3, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Page, S.
The immediate beneficiary of the entire net estate of the testator is his widow, Ethel R. Furry. Except for some minor bequests to the widow, all the net estate is directed to be *764held in trust for her life benefit. Upon her death, the trust is limited upon the life of Ethel M. Reynolds, a niece of testator’s widow. The remainder is directed to be divided into two equal parts, one of which devolves to the Union Presbyterian Church of Endicott, New York, and the other to “ lineal descendants ” of said Ethel M. Reynolds or, failing any such, then the whole remainder to the said church.
The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Woodward v. . JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Lawrence v. . LittlefieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of AlbertsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Darling v. Rogers & SagoryCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- In Re the Accounting of Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Barrett's EstateNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- In re the Accounting of United States Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1950