Legal Opinion
In Re Davis
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided March 29, 1984No. Bankruptcy 383-02360PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
KEITH M. LUNDIN, Bankruptcy Judge.
The issue is whether the debtor may amend his exemption schedule more than 15 days after his meeting of creditors, but before the case is closed. The trustee argues on the authority of In re Brewer, 17 B.R. 186 (Bkrtcy.M.D.Tenn.) aff'd, 22 B.R. 983 (D.C.M.D.Tenn.1982) that the debtor’s amended exemption schedule, filed more than 15 days after the meeting of creditors, is untimely and should not be allowed. Upon consideration of the arguments of the parties and applicable authority, the court holds that a debtor may amend the exemption schedule at…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In the Matter of Arthur Gershenbaum, Bankrupt. Appeal of Arthur GershenbaumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Christopher J. Redmond v. Lamonte Russell Tuttle and Ruth Ella TuttleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Credithrift of America, Inc. v. Dubrock (In Re Dubrock)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1980
- Andermahr v. Barrus (In Re Andermahr)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Yoder v. United States (In Re Yoder)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Frederick C. Lucius and Carliss Jean Lucius, Debtors-Appellants v. John C. McLemore Trustee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- In Re BlaiseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1990
- In Re HillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1988
- In Re WallerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- In Re AkulovaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.