Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Brown

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 28, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

The petitioner for a writ of certiorari in this proceeding applied to the selectmen of Brunswick for a license to plant and propagate clams on the flats adjoining his' lands in that town as authorized by P. L. 1933, Chap. 2, Sec. 43, et seq., and his application was denied. His petition in the usual form prays that a writ of certiorari issue and the action of the selectmen be quashed. Their answer admits the truth of the facts alleged, asserts their authority to refuse to issue the license, and prays that the petition be dismissed. Without ordering the writ to issue, by agreement of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Trustees of Jamaica v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Devlin v. DaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Toulouse v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  2. Rogers v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
  3. Carter v. WilkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964
  4. Inhabitants of North Berwick v. State Board of EducationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  5. Brooks v. CliffordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API