Legal Opinion

La Vack v. National Shoes, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 23, 1986PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In August 1980, plaintiff allegedly fell and was injured while working at the shoe department of defendant Ames Department Store (Ames). Ames’ shoe department is operated by defendant J. Baker, Inc. (Baker), a wholly owned subsidiary of defendant National Shoes, Inc. (National). Ames is located on property owned by defendants Irene Hendra, Arthur Rotundo, Thomas Rotundo and Henry Rotundo.*

After plaintiff commenced her negligence action, defendants asserted cross claims against each other. Ames was subsequently granted summary judgment holding Baker liable to indemnify it. Additionally, Baker…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hogeland v. SibleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Tefft v. Apex Pawnbroking & Jewelry Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pellegrino v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Pietsch v. Moog, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Jensen v. Chevron Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Taylor v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1991
  5. Cidis v. Net Realty Holding TrustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API