Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 25, 2011No. 02-56256, 02-56390, 09-56381Published

1DissentIkuta, Circuit Judge

In its rush to announce which decisions of selected international tribunals, which unratified or unenforceable treaties, and which favorite academic theories create international law norms enforceable in federal courts, the majority has stumbled on the *819threshold question: whether the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) gives us jurisdiction over this particular suit at all. As it happens, this threshold is no mere doorsill but a formidable obstacle: in fact, the ATS gives us no authority to hear a case where an alien sues another alien. That is, Congress enacted the ATS under the authority of the…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API