Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Cole

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1936No. 11296PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eussell, Chief Justice.

D. M. Cole, as trustee in bankruptcy of J. E. Eowe, instituted his equitable action against the bankrupt and his wife, seeking to have set aside and canceled a certain deed from the husband to the wife. He alleged that such deed was made to hinder, delay, and defraud the creditors of J. E. Eowe. By her answer the wife practically placed herself in the position *478of a claimant of the property sought to be subjected by plaintiff’s petition. Both defendants denied that the deed was made to hinder, delay, or defraud the creditors of the bankrupt. The answer alleged, that the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Ford v. Blackshear Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Eberhardt v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. Hunt v. DoyalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Bell v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Hartsfield Loan & Savings Co. v. GarnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Ellenberg v. Bouldin (In Re Bouldin)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996
  4. Parker v. HarlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API