Legal Opinion

United States v. Barley

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 2, 2005No. CR 04-0408 WHAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

ALSUP, District Judge.

For the reasons stated by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte, the dismissals are Affirmed. All further issues raised on appeal are, in this Court’s view, adequately answered as follows.

* * * * * *. Off-leash dog use had been a long tradition at various fields and beaches within what became the Golden Gate National Recreation Area in 1974. When the GGNRA was formed, an issue arose over the extent to which this tradition should continue. So far as this record reveals, neither the National Park Service nor anyone else then suggested that park service…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riverbend Farms, Inc. v. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Ft. Funston Dog Walkers v. BabbittDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. EQUITY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES v. YatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Lunsford v. US National Park ServiceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API