Legal Opinion

Pearrow v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 19, 1938PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for $10,000 damages for personal injuries. The jury found for defendant. Thereafter, the court sustained plaintiff's motion for a new trial on the ground that certain instructions, given at the request of defendant, "were erroneous, misleading and prejudicial to the plaintiff." Defendant has appealed from this order.

[1] Defendant contends that any error in instructions is immaterial because plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law and, therefore, defendant was entitled to a directed verdict. We state the facts shown by the evidence, considered most…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Castorina v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. Kelsay v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. State Ex Rel. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Doherty Ex Rel. Doherty v. St. Louis Butter Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. Hayden v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Branson v. Abernathy Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Ferguson v. BettertonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. Thomas Grain Fumigant Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Swain v. AndersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Joshmer v. Fred Weber Contractors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API