Legal Opinion

Cuppy v. State ex rel. Grantham

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1865PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Sullivan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRay, J.

Prosecution for bastardy. The relatrix was a married woman, residing with her husband. She was permitted, over the objection of the defendant, to prove *390non-access by the husband; that he had been in the army for more than a- year preceding the birth of the child. Our statutes, prior to 1843, provided that such proceedings-, might be instituted by any “ unmarried woman.” Under such a statute, it was held that a prosecution could not be sustained on the relation of a married woman. Smith v. The State, 4 Blackf. 188. The statute was changed in 1843, so as to read, “when any woman,” &c., and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1836

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Evans v. State ex rel. FreemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Pilgrim v. PilgrimIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Doyle v. State, ex rel. ShetterlyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  5. Evans v. State ex rel. FreemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API