Bowman v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Judge.
Appellants Madia Bowman and Michael Hirsh were jointly tried before a jury on accusations which charged that they “did, knowingly and without authority, remain upon the premises of Feminist Women’s Health Center [FWHC], . . . after receiving notice from ... a properly identified and authorized representative of said owner of said premises to depart from said premises. . . .” See OCGA § 16-7-21 (b) (3). The jury returned guilty verdicts. Appellants appeal from the judgments of conviction and the sentences which were entered by the trial court on the jury’s verdicts.
1. Appellants…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Williams v. KempSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Gellis v. B. L. I. Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bowman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Causey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Ralston v. Etowah BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.