Legal Opinion

Ross v. Dinsmore

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1861PublishedCited by 2 opinions

■ Motion by defendants to set aside amended complaints as irregular, on the ground that they were served without leave of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Hogeboom, Justice.

Section 172 of the Code, gives to a party the right to amend any pleading once, as a matter of course, either before or after a reply to it shall have been made. This right is a statutory one, and is absolute and unqualified, with the single restriction that it shall not be exercised for purposes of delay.

In this case, the plaintiff having served his complaint, the defendants moved to strike out portions thereof, as irrelevant and redundant. This motion was granted. This cannot be considered an amendment within the meaning of this section. It was the act of the court, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jeroliman v. CohenThe Superior Court of New York City · 1852

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Hancock v. Delaware & Eastern RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Lintzenich v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API