Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 1, 2010No. 2010-1105Published

1Dissent

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, with whom RADER, Chief Judge, and LOURIE and LINN, Circuit Judges, join,

dissenting from denial of the Petition for Rehearing En Banc.

I respectfully dissent from the court’s denial of the request to rehear this case en banc, for inconsistent precedent warrants clarification. Until recently the law of double patenting was clear, but it has become distorted by divergent statements, leading to this flawed ruling.

Until recently it was beyond dispute that the law of double patenting is concerned only with what is patented — that is, what is claimed. To determine whether there…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Application of Virgil W. Vogel and Paul W. VogelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Pfizer, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  3. General Foods Corporation v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle MbhCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. In Re Leonard Kaplan and Wellington Epler WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  5. In re SarettUnited States Customs Court · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API