Legal Opinion

Hancock v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 23, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStrum, J.

Upon an information charging assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree, the plaintiff in error (hereinafter designated as the defendant) was tried and convicted of the offense of assault with intent to commit manslaughter. To that' judgment writ of error was taken.

The evidence discloses that George IT. Hancock and J. P. Halsema, the former a son of the defendant, were purchasing from Dr. Wildman, the victim of the assault, a drug store located in Miami, Florida. The purchasers had been given possession of the store and were operating and managing the same, the defendant…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  3. Wilson ex rel. Otis v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  4. Cross v. AbySupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  5. Hays v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  2. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  3. Fouts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. Luttrell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  5. Schaffer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API