Legal Opinion

James v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1993No. 90-AA-1361Published

1Opinion of the Court

632 A.2d 395 (1993)

Durwood C. JAMES, Petitioner,

v.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, Respondent.

No. 90-AA-1361.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued April 16, 1993.

Decided October 14, 1993.

Durwood C. James, pro se.

Michael A. Milwee, for respondent.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, and SCHWELB and FARRELL, Associate Judges.

FARRELL, Associate Judge:

In discussing the admission of a particular form of hearsay, the Supreme Court has observed:

[I]ndividual pieces of evidence, insufficient in themselves to prove a point, may in cumulation prove it. The sum of an evidentiary…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Coates v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Ramon P. Johnson v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API