Western States Construction, Inc. v. Michoff
Nevada Supreme Court
1DissentSpringer, J.
Lois and Max are not married; yet the trial court treated them as though they were married. The trial court heard and decided this case under our divorce statute (NRS Chapter 125, Marriage and Dissolution). The trial court disposed of the property owned by each party as though it were community property, calling it “community property by analogy.” The final decree in this case was entered in accordance with the divorce statute, NRS 125.150, which provides that “[i]n granting a divorce, the court . . . [sjhall make such disposition of . . . [t]he community property of the parties ... as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Elden v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Kozlowski v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Hay v. HayNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Omer v. OmerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.