Legal Opinion · Dissent

Western States Construction, Inc. v. Michoff

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1992No. 19793Published

1DissentSpringer, J.

Lois and Max are not married; yet the trial court treated them as though they were married. The trial court heard and decided this case under our divorce statute (NRS Chapter 125, Marriage and Dissolution). The trial court disposed of the property owned by each party as though it were community property, calling it “community property by analogy.” The final decree in this case was entered in accordance with the divorce statute, NRS 125.150, which provides that “[i]n granting a divorce, the court . . . [sjhall make such disposition of . . . [t]he community property of the parties ... as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Elden v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Kozlowski v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Hay v. HayNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Omer v. OmerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API