Legal Opinion
Byrne v. Autohaus on Edens, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 20, 1980No. 79 C 815PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Motion for Summary Judgment
MAROVITZ, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff James C. Byrne brings this action pro se against Autohaus On Edens, Inc. under the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (the “Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1981-91. Pending before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s claims. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is granted.
The Act, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, 1 create a federal regulatory scheme designed, inter alia, to prevent the alteration of motor vehicle odometers, 15 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Margaret Morgan v. Walter G. Koch, Ivan H. Morgan, Morgan Packing Co., Inc., Herman C. Krannert and Inland Container Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- The Palisades at Fort Lee Condominium Association, Inc. v. 100 Old Palisades, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- Alexander v. Southeastern Wholesale Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Bill Terry's Inc. v. Atlantic Motor Sales, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Ferris v. HaymoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Attorney General of Maryland v. DicksonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.