Bond v. Dentzer
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES T. FOLEY, Chief Judge.
OPINION — JUDGMENT — ORDER
PART I — FACTS
The parties are in accord on the material facts in this case. Summary judgment is appropriate in such circumstances and the plaintiffs have filed a motion for the same. The defendants move to dismiss the complaint upon three stated grounds.
Plaintiffs Bond and Baldwin are of low-income and have been represented by the Legal Aid Society of Albany. They are each alleged to have owed amounts of under three hundred dollars to defendants, the Beneficial Finance Co. and the Protective Loan Corp. (hereafter ‘finance companies’).…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brenda Joyce Northrip v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Bond v. DentzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Northrip v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
- Global Industries, Inc. v. HarrisDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1974
- Guernsey v. Rich Plan of the MidwestDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.