Legal Opinion

Tamir v. Virgin Atlantic Airlines

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 14, 2006No. 05-55856Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Uri Tamir appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting Virgin Atlantic Airlines’ motion for partial summary judgment and limiting Tamir’s recovery for his lost luggage pursuant to the Warsaw Convention. Because the district court subsequently entered judgment against defendant, we have jurisdiction. See, e.g., Anderson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 630 F.2d 677, 680-81 (9th Cir.1980) (exercising appellate jurisdiction over orders that were not final when entered, where remaining claims were later disposed of, and noting that “subsequent events can validate a prematurely filed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Luverne L. Anderson and Josephine Rodriguez v. Allstate Insurance Company, a California Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Rodriguez v. Ansett Australia Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API