Legal Opinion

People v. Gardner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The prosecutor’s reference in his opening statement to defendant’s prior conviction for driving while intoxicated does not require reversal because the conviction was a necessary element of the aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle charge (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law *1231§ 511 [3]; People v Miller, 163 AD2d 627, 629, lv denied 76 NY2d 942; People v Cooper, 158 AD2d 743; People v Koponen, 129 AD2d 838). Defendant’s remaining contentions lack merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Reed, J.— Felony Driving While Intoxicated.)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. People v. KoponenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. PowlowskiRochester City Court · 1997
  2. People v. LazzarWebster Justice of the Peace Court · 2004
  3. People v. LazzarWebster Justice of the Peace Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API