Legal Opinion

Payne v. Gardner

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 18, 2011No. 2010-C-2627PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.*

1,Finding the Court of Appeal erred in reversing summary judgment on the basis there are material issues of fact regarding whether Lufkin Industries, Inc. (“Lufkin”) should have reasonably anticipated an ordinary person in the same or similar circumstances would use or handle its pumping unit as a “ride,” we grant this writ to reinstate the District Court’s judgment, granting Lufkin’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing plaintiffs claim with prejudice.

This litigation arises from an accident that occurred in rural Rapides Parish on March 9, 2004, when thirteen-year-old Henry…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Bloxom v. BloxomSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. Delphen v. Dept. of Transp. & Dev.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Daigle v. Audi of America, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Dunne v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hutto v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Matthews v. Remington Arms Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  3. Walker v. Manitowoc Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Duncan v. PoydrasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Attuso v. Omegaflex, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2020

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API