Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 19, 1994No. 93-3813Published

1Opinion of the Court

FARMER, Judge.

We affirm the order denying defendant’s motion to suppress. After the trial court denied the motion, defendant entered into a plea agreement, accepted by the trial judge, *710to plead no contest with a reservation of his right to appeal on the suppression issue in return for a below guidelines sentence. The court, however, imposed a more severe sentence within the guidelines when defendant failed to appear at the sentencing hearing. Because the plea agreement made no provision for a more serious sentence if defendant failed to appear for sentencing, the court was required either to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Payne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Edwards v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API