Legal Opinion

Witt v. Bristol Farms

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 3, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00411Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SALIMA WITT, Case No. 21-cv-00411-BAS-AGS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. ex parte APPLICATION FOR ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL 14 BRISTOL FARMS, et al., JUDGMENT (ECF No. 21) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Plaintiff Salima Witt (“Witt”) sued Defendants UC San Diego Health, University of 20 California Health (together, “Regents of the University of California”), and Bristol Farms, 21 raising claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Rehabilitation 22 Act of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Lockett v. Catalina Channel Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Holbrook v. United States Nat. BankDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API