Legal Opinion · Dissent

Boswell v. General Oils, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 22, 1978No. Civ. 1599Published

1Dissent

I must respectfully dissent from the decision of the majority. The premise of the trial court and of the majority decision here is that because an element (sulphur) contained in the oil purchased by Mead Corporation ultimately found its way into the manufactured products (paper and cooking liquor), the purchase of the oil was at wholesale and not subject to sales tax. That premise arises from the decisions of our appellate courts interpreting § 40-23-1 (a)(9)(b), Code of Alabama (1975) and its predecessor Title 51, § 786 (2)(i), Code of Alabama (1940) (Recomp. 1958). Robertson Associates…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Southern Kraft CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. State v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Boswell v. Abex CorporationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  4. Robertson & Associates (Ala.), Inc. v. BoswellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API