Jeffries v. Morgan
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Eeros, to Pulaski Circuit Court. This was an action of debt on a judgment recovered against the plaintiff in error in the State o£ Alabama. The record states that the plaintiff in error confessed judgment in the court below for $429 40 debt, and $168 damages, to reverse which judgment for an error, as he contended, in the computation of interest, he brought his writ of error.
Read the full summary
Eeros, to Pulaski Circuit Court. This was an action of debt on a judgment recovered against the plaintiff in error in the State o£ Alabama. The record states that the plaintiff in error confessed judgment in the court below for $429 40 debt, and $168 damages, to reverse which judgment for an error, as he contended, in the computation of interest, he brought his writ of error. The only question for the consider, ation of the court is as to the amount of interest to be allowed on the judgment in Alabama. The defendant contends that the judgment below is for a greater sum than purports to be due…
1Opinion of the CourtLacy, Judge
This is an action of debt, founded on a judgment recovered by the plaintiff below, against the defendant, in the State of Alabama.
The record shows that the present plaintiff in error came into open court, and in proper person confessed judgment “ for the sum of four hundred and twenty-nine dollars and forty cents, the debt in the declaration mentioned, and also the sum of one hundred and sixty-six dollars in damages.” The Circuit Court gave judgment for the two sums acknowledged to be due. To reverse the judgment so rendered, the defendant now prosecutes his writ of error in this court.
There…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Cave v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912