United States v. Arthur N. Olive Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFREY, District Judge.
This is an action under the Miller Act. After a protracted jury trial plaintiff recovered a judgment in the amount of $30,633.17, with interest of $4,441.82.
Upon appeal the amended judgment was vacated as to Paragraphs 1 and 2, the verdict was set aside as to the award of damages in Paragraphs 1 and 2, and *140the ease remanded to this Court for a new trial restricted exclusively to the amount of damages properly recoverable. Paragraph 3 of the amended judgment, dismissing defendants’ counterclaim, was affirmed. The mandate of the Court of Appeals awarded costs on appeal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Land Oberoesterreich v. GudeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Bankers Securities Corp. v. Ritz Carlton Restaurant & Hotel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Broffe v. HortonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
3Cited by1 opinion
- Conway Groves, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1994