Legal Opinion

Amey v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 30, 1954No. Docket No. 40524Published

Payments made by a lessee of property to the mortgagee in reduction of the outstanding mortgage indebtedness constituted rental income to petitioner-lessor, even though petitioner was not personally liable on the mortgage.

1Opinion of the Court

Ethel S. Amey, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Amey v. Commissioner

Docket No. 40524

United States Tax Court

22 T.C. 756; 1954 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 154;

June 30, 1954, Filed June 30, 1954, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

Payments made by a lessee of property to the mortgagee in reduction of the outstanding mortgage indebtedness constituted rental income to petitioner-lessor, even though petitioner was not personally liable on the mortgage.

Maurice D. Dolphin, Esq., for the petitioner.

George E. Grimball, Jr., Esq., for the respondent.

Arundell, Judge.

ARUNDELL

Respo…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Amey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API