People v. Constant
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
*844ERICKSON, Justice.
We granted certiorari to review People v. Constant, Colo.App., 623 P.2d 63 (1980), which granted the defendant, Gardy Constant, a new trial because the prosecutor’s closing argument called the jury’s attention to the fact that the defendant was laughing while the complaining witness testified and during the prosecution’s closing argument. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand to the court of appeals with directions to affirm the judgment of conviction.
The defendant was convicted by a jury of first-degree sexual assault,1 second-degree burglary,2 and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Anthony F. WrightCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- People v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. SepedaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- State v. PadillaIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Wilson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Domingo-Gomez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Harris v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- People v. HamptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- People v. DiefenderferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.