Legal Opinion
Seager v. Dauphinee
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 13, 1933PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The plaintiff by this suit in equity seeks relief against several defendants for loss occasioned to him because a certified check taken by him in part payment for conveyance of land was not paid. The material facts were found by the trial judge in substance as follows: The plaintiff executed a deed of land in Boston to the defendant Dauphinee, who was the nominee of the defendant Green-berg. The agreement for that conveyance called for the payment of $900 in cash and a mortgage for $4,300. The papers in the transaction were passed in the office of Green-berg in Boston at about eleven o’clock…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Briggs v. SanfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Granlund v. SarafMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- First Baptist Society v. DexterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Gordon v. LevineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Minot v. RussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Birnbaum v. PamoukisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Economy Grocery Stores Corp. v. McMenamyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Ahern v. TowleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Town of Lexington v. GovenarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Wyness v. CrowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.