Goldberger v. Goldman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan; Arthur J. Tuttle, Judge. Action at law by Hyman E. Goldman against Maurice Goldberger. judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Per curiam
Plaintiff and defendant indorsed a note for a corporation in which both were stockholders. Plaintiff sued to recover the amount-which he was compelled to pay by reason of his indorsement under the claim that defendant had agreed, as between himself and plaintiff, to pay the note. Upon the first trial, verdict was instructed for defendant. This court reversed the judgment. Goldman v. Goldberger, 208 Fed. 877, 126 C. C. A. 35. On the second trial, the sole ultimate question 'was one of fact, viz., whether the defendant made the alleged agreement to pay the note. Defendant takes no exceptions to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Goldman v. GoldbergerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913