Legal Opinion

Heinsch v. Kirby

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 4, 1946No. 34,328PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christianson, Justice.

This matter is before us on an order to show cause why a writ of prohibition should not be issued. The proceeding arises out of an unlawful detainer action commenced by plaintiffs to gain possession of certain premises from defendants, who were holding the premises under a month-to-month lease. The basis of the action was that there had been a termination of the lease by notice. The action was heard by the court without a jury and resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for judgment in favor of plaintiffs. Judgment of restitution was duly entered in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jonason v. CrosbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  2. Huhn v. Foley Bros. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. State ex rel. Jarvis v. CraigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bellows v. EricsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Marine v. WhippleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. In Re Petition of ParksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Juster v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Marine v. WhippleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API