Legal Opinion

LoPresti v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 1, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

The declaration in this action of tort contains two counts. In the first count, Angelina LoPresti (hereinafter called the plaintiff) seeks damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence; in the second count, the plaintiff’s husband seeks consequential damages. Verdicts were returned for each plaintiff. The case comes here on the defendant’s exceptions to the denial of its motion for directed verdicts, a ruling on evidence, and to a portion of the charge.

The evidence most favorable to the plaintiff was as follows : On October 4, 1958, at about 1 p.m.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Boyd v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Parker v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Magaw v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API