State v. Young

The information upon which the appellant was tried and convicted charged that he did unlawfully “have in his possession certain narcotic drugs, . . . with intent to sell, furnish and dispose of same, . . .” and then proceeded to state that this possession was without a physician’s prescription and also that the possession had been obtained contrary to state and federal laws.

The appellant claims that he was entitled to a dismissal for the reason that there was no evidence offered by the state supporting the. allegations of the state that he had acquired the narcotics in violation of law, and…