Legal Opinion

Schouest v. Burr

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 2010No. 09-CA-356Published

1Opinion of the Court

30 So.3d 1017 (2010)

Michael P. SCHOUEST

v.

Douglas J. BURR d/b/a Chilly's Sno Balls, John Doe and XYZ Insurance Company.

No. 09-CA-356.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.

January 12, 2010.

Michael A. Fenasci, Attorney at Law, New Orleans, LA, Wayne W. Yuspeh, Attorney at Law, Metairie, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee.

Michael R. Zsembik, Attorney at Law, Metairie, LA, for Defendants/Appellants.

Panel composed of Judges SUSAN M. CHEHARDY, FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER and MARC E. JOHNSON.

MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendants/Appellants, Douglas J. Burr d/b/a Chilly's Sno Balls and Travelers Indemnity…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Evans v. LungrinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  3. Wainwright v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  4. Lasha v. Olin Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  5. Riddle v. BickfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API