Legal Opinion
State v. Ragland
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 4, 2014No. 13AP-451PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as State v. Ragland,
2014-Ohio-798.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 13AP-451 v. : (C.P.C. No. 00CR-02-0516) Randolph R. Ragland, : (ACCELERATED CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on March 4, 2014 Ron O'Brien, Prosecuting Attorney, and Laura R. Swisher, for appellee. Randolph R. Ragland, pro se. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas SADLER, P.J. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Randolph R. Ragland, appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CockroftOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. MaserOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. HaydenOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. NetterOhio Court of Appeals · 2014