Legal Opinion

State v. Rose

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1990No. 89-KA-0120PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLOTKIN, Judge.

Defendant Willie Rose appeals a jury verdict finding him guilty of violating LSA-R.S. 40:966, relative to distribution of a controlled Schedule I substance, marijuana. We affirm.

Facts:

While working undercover in the 800 block of North White Street in the City of New Orleans on May 29, 1987, New Orleans Police Officer James Pollard observed the defendant, Willie Rose, engage in an apparent drug transaction. Officer Pollard testified that he was conducting a surveillance across the street from Rose’s residence at 824 North White at approximately 4:30 that afternoon, when he saw a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. State v. QuebedeauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  3. State v. FraserSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  4. State v. BrogdonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  5. Brogdon v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. State v. ScieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. State v. SlaterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API