Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. Camden Safe Deposit & Trust Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 15, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On appeal from an order advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney in Camden Safe Deposit and Trust Co. v. .Atlantic City Ocean Pier Co., who delivered the following opinion : The petitioner prays to be made a party defendant in an ordinary foreclosure suit, and shows himself to be a creditor of the mortgagor and defendant, and that his debt accrued for services rendered by him as an employe- of the defendant, which he says is insolvent and in the hands of a receiver.

Read the full summary

On appeal from an order advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney in Camden Safe Deposit and Trust Co. v. .Atlantic City Ocean Pier Co., who delivered the following opinion : The petitioner prays to be made a party defendant in an ordinary foreclosure suit, and shows himself to be a creditor of the mortgagor and defendant, and that his debt accrued for services rendered by him as an employe- of the defendant, which he says is insolvent and in the hands of a receiver. His claim is based upon section 63 of the Corporation act (Pev. p. 188), as amended by the act of March 31st, 1887. P. L. of 1887 p.…

1Per curiam

This order is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Smith, Whitaker — 12.

For reversal — None.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. J.W. Pierson Co. v. West Orange-Verona Bldg. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API