Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gore v. Davis

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 18, 1979No. 34437Published

1DissentJordan, Justice

In my opinion the majority opinion overlooks the manifest intent of the statute. Its provisions apply only when the owner of the repaired or stored vehicle cannot be ascertained. The statute requires that the person removing or storing the vehicle "shall diligently seek the identity of the owner and shall notify such owner of the vehicle.” Code Ann. § 68-2302. The statute provides that "if the owner cannot be ascertained, the person impounding” can then proceed with the advertising and sale of the vehicle and disposition of the proceeds of the sale as provided in the statute.

Clearly, then, if…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. SelfCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API