Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Bell

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1945No. 35969PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGehee, J.

This suit was filed by the appellee, W. M. Bell, to quiet his title to a 1/32 royalty interest in all gas, oil and other minerals on approximately 3,000 acres of land which he had conveyed to the appellant, George W. Armstrong, on July 2, 1936, under a reservation or exception in that behalf, and to cancel as a cloud upon his title thereto the claim being made by the defendant Armstrong to the effect that the complainant Bell now owns only a 1/32 interest in the oil, gas and other minerals.in place on said land, instead of a 1/32 royalty interest therein, under the reservation made in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. BatsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  2. McNeese v. RennerMississippi Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Calcote v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  2. Koenig v. Calcote Et Ux.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Superior Oil Co. v. BeeryMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Atlantic Refining Company v. BeachNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Warfield v. Marks Marks v. WarfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API