Myles v. Flora

NEAL, Presiding Judge.

STATEMENT. OF THE CASE

Defendant-appellant, Arthur Myles (Myles) appeals a judgment rendered by the Vigo County Court, Division 4, in favor of Owen E. Flora (Flora). Myles challenges the court’s ruling in a proceeding supplemental that a savings and loan deposit was intangible personal property for the purpose of exemption from execution under IND.CODE 34-2-28-1.

We affirm.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

Flora obtained a judgment for labor and material against Myles for $1500.00, interest and costs. Thereafter in proceedings supplemental, the court ordered the garnishee defendant,…