Legal Opinion

Erdreich v. Zimmerman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, in favor of the defendants, entered upon the verdict of a jury directed by the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMullan, J.

There is no substantial disagreement as to the facts. The plaintiff, on December 14, 1916, purchased from defendants, paying $1,775 therefor, five per cent bonds of the German government, Fifth War Loan, in the amount of 10,000 marks. The receipt provided that “ the aforesaid securities are to be delivered by us [defendants] at our office against return of this interim certificate, upon arrival from Europe. ’ ’ The bonds have never been delivered. The plaintiff knew there would be some delay. In February, 1917, he called upon defendants and asked when he might expect to receive the bonds and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kannengiesser v. IsraelowitzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Erdreich v. ZimmermannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API