Etheridge v. Hobbs
Supreme Court of Georgia
Evidence. Practice in Superior Court. Charge of Court. Witness. Before Judge Willis. Taylor Superior Court. August Term, 1886. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford, Justice.
This was an action on a promissory note, brought by the plaintiffs in error against the defendants in error. The defendants, Bailey and Woodall, pleaded non est factum. A verdict was found in favor of the defendants, Bailey and Woodall, and thereupon the plaintiffs moved for a new trial, which being denied by the court, the plaintiffs bring the case here for review.
1. The .first ground of the motion complains that the court erred in refusing to allow plaintiffs’ counsel to prove by Abner Woodall, while under cross-examination, that he had authorized J. B. Hobbs to sign his…
2Cited by30 opinions
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Wallace v. MizeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Evans v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Slaughter v. LinderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Bass v. BassSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.